Today I was talking with someone about "psychometric tools." She asked which psychometric tools I use in my coaching. I've had access and used 360's, DISC, MBTI. I've experienced these and many more and I really enjoyed them. They're interesting. But are they really essential to gaining new insights that support making a shift in performance for an individual?
What's your experience with psychometric tools?
Are they crucial for a coach to use or should a coach work with the leader to learn how to seek and obtain the information they need to be most effective?
When are these tools most appropriate?
The Shocker!
I remember the first 360 I had while working at 3M. I was shocked at the responses from my direct reports.
In reality, I shouldn't have been.
As a leader, I was very aware that they were not happy with me or their jobs. I had been promoted into the position, one of them felt he was far more qualified and deserving of the position than me. He probably was.
The 360 was a reflection on the feedback providers as well as me. This 360 was really a snapshot of those relationships. When I look at what going on at the time, I wasn't being authentic. I wasn't honoring the people who depended on me, nor was I honoring my values.
The big learning for me is that this information was available to me all along. All I needed to do was ask. I needed to learn to be more engaged with my employees and peers. The 360 served as a wake up call, but my reaction to the feedback probably wasn't the most productive response either.
Quite frankly, the information I've received from these instruments primarily served to confirm what I already knew about myself, including the "blind spots" and "hidden talents." I've generally found the same is true for the people I've coached.
There are some cases where clients have been absolutely dumbfounded by the feedback, but that's because no one ever took the time or dared talk with them directly. In talking with them, they've worked very hard at seeing only the information which confirms their self image and deny anything that might undermine it.
When discussing the 360 feedback, each person could clearly identify the incidents that led to the feedback. Even with that, some denied the "validity" of the feedback. So how useful is the tool if the client chooses to ignore the feedback?
Getting to the Point
The most useful and growth focused feedback I've received has been directly from people with whom I've develop a very open and trusting relationship. I've had great relationships with supervisors, peers, direct reports and coaches. The feedback that comes through them, often challenging and sometimes tough to take has landed more effectively and given me the motivation to work toward being more effective and aware of those things I'm not great at.
This feedback has always been available to me. I believe the key thing for an effective leader is to learn to get effective feedback it without having to resort to a self assessment or a questionnaire behind which the learner and the feedback provider can hide.
My coaching clients learn the skills of seeking feedback and building the kinds of relationships where they can have the candid dialog they need for personal growth.
Give me your feedback.
Thank you




Recent Comments